Over the past few decades there has been quite a lot of debate about the reliance on violence risk assessment for both sentencing and prison parole/release purposes. conduct some additional research to further explore this practice. In a 2-3 page paper discuss the following:
Compare and contrast the different methods of assessment â clinical, actuarial, structural professional judgment (this should be a substantial section of your paper)
If you were a practicing forensic psychologist which of these, or combination of these would you use? Why do you think this is the best strategy?
How reliable is violence risk assessment? (you must support your conclusion – this should not be your personal opinion)
Why do many in the field have a problem using this type of assessment when making sentencing and/or release decisions for offenders?
Why do many in the field have a problem using this type of assessment when making sentencing and/or release decisions for offenders?
Need help With this Or a Simmilar Assignment
We will write a custom essay on your topic tailored to your instructions!