The Analyzing Published Research paper is the second of three related assignment

The Analyzing Published Research paper is the second of three related assignments. The first assignment I have attached (Entitled: RUA Week 3) as a reference. The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic: Strategies to reduce the contraction and spread of infectious diseases by nurses.
Articles listed below:
1. Houghton, C., Meskell, P., Delaney, H., Smalle, M., Glenton, C., Booth, A., Chan, X. H. S., Devane, D., & Biesty, L. M. (2020). Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers’ adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd013582
2. Nie, A., Su, X., Dong, M., & Guan, W. (2022). Are nurses prepared to respond to next infectious disease outbreak: A narrative synthesis. Nursing Open, 9(2), 908–919. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1170
Attached is a sample paper given by the professor that provides the perfect layout for this assignment. I’ve also attached the rubric and a copy of the matrix table needed, however the table is also provided in the sample paper as well.
GUIDELINES and required criteria:
Clinical Question (30 points)
1. Describe the problem: What is the focus of your group’s work?
2. Significance of problem: What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations.
3. Purpose of the paper: What will your paper do or describe?
Evidence Matrix Table: Data Summary (Appendix A) (60 points)
Categorize items in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article.
1. References (recent publication within the last 5 years)
2. Purpose/Hypothesis/Study Question(s)
3. Variables: Independent (I) and Dependent (D)
4. Study Design
5. Sample Size and Selection
6. Data Collection Methods
7. Major Findings (Evidence)
Description of Findings (60 points)
Describe the data in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article.
1. Compare and contrast variables within each study.
2. What are the study design and procedures used in each study; qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method study, levels of confidence in each study, etc.?
3. Participant demographics and information.
4. Instruments used, including reliability and validity.
5. How do the research findings provide evidence to support your clinical problem, or what further evidence is needed to answer your question?
6. Next steps: Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.
Conclusion (20 points)
Review major findings in a summary paragraph.
1. Evidence to address your clinical problem.
2. Make a connection back to all the included sections.
3. Wrap up the assignment and give the reader something to think about.
Format (30 points)
1. Correct grammar and spelling
2. Include a title and reference page
3. Use of headings for each section:
o Problem
o Synthesis of the Literature
 Variables
 Methods
 Participants
 Instruments
 Implications for Future Work
4. Conclusion
5. Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines
6. Includes at least two (2) scholarly, current (within 5 years) primary sources other than the textbook
7. 3-4 pages in length excluding appendices, title and reference pages