Using the criteria presented in week 2, critique the theory of Self-Efficacy usi

Using the criteria presented in week 2, critique the theory of Self-Efficacy using the internal and external criticism evaluation process.
In week 2, we expressed the following (please do not use physician act or something related to the physician field, this assignment is for NURSING):
Week 2 discussion:
Internal and External Criticism in Evaluating Middle-Range Theories
The middle-range theory is a method of sociological thinking that combines theory with actual evidence. Robert Merton came up with the idea. It is presently the predominant approach to forming sociological theories, particularly in the United States. The medium-ranger nursing theory is significant for medical students since it gives them an intermediate realism perspective and more particular generic areas of expertise (Riegel et al., 2019). It also gives actual suggestions to the physicians, which are restricted but quite beneficial. Likewise, the Middle-range theory describes the progression of clinical skills. Multidisciplinary concepts can benefit from middle-range models since they provide good organizational frames for the topic under investigation. Nurses and people from other disciplines might utilize these concepts to frame issues of mutual concern (Mgbekem et al., 2016). When analyzing a theory, internal and external critique must be considered; internal criticism deals with the inner core, while exterior critique deals with the surrounding connection (Riegel et al., 2019).
There are profound internal and external critiques used in examining middle-range theories. Nursing research is a physician’s act to help a patient avoid illness, preserve health, and improve health. Several thinkers contributed to a paradigm or template for physicians to deliver clinical outcomes. Nursing research has always shaped norms, opinions, and conventions, with no questioning of daily practices (Mgbekem et al., 2016). Consequently, the competent physician was determined based on a caring attitude and certain technical skills acquired via care facility practice. The goal of the nursing concept is to characterize, anticipate, and interpret healthcare phenomena. Nursing is concerned with the rules and principles that regulate ill and healthy people’s life processes and functions. Nursing research helps comprehend nursing information and practice. Middle-range theories are supportive in dealing with nursing issues, particularly among disadvantaged groups. These models are broad enough to extend to a diverse variety of patient characteristics and practice scenarios, despite focusing on relevant events in healthcare.
Furthermore, these theories are applied to all aspects of nursing, including training, management, and primary care. Due to inner medical, scientific research objectives, and philosophical challenges of legal positivism, middle-range theory flourished in the 1980s and 1990s. Yet, the middle-range theory has a considerably older history in nursing. The great majority of nursing science has undoubtedly been in the center of the conceptual scale, with not only a restraint reach nor a micro-level emphasis (Mgbekem et al., 2016). Most nurses hold that middle-range theory interventions are more focused on fixing problems and, when done at the hospital as designed, ultimately result in favorable health outcomes for patients.
Nurse theory should concentrate on improving patient outcomes and contentment in the long term, and medium-range theories would aid this progress. The physician would be guided into future situations by evidence-based practice established via scientific literature and theories (Mgbekem et al., 2016). Ultimately, the nurse practitioner must incorporate components, practices, and inquiry to attain professional responsibility. This is because each is necessary and helpful to the other. The model can contribute to theory production and creates a basis for steering research and practice.
References
Mgbekem, M. A., Ojong, I. N., Lukpata, F. E., Armon, M., & Kalu, V. (2016). Middle range theory evaluation: bridging the theory-practice gap. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 22(2), 249-254.
Riegel, B., Jaarsma, T., Lee, C. S., & Strömberg, A. (2019). Integrating symptoms into the middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. ANS. Advances in nursing science, 42(3), 206.
Rubric:
The student provides in-depth coverage of discussion topic (s), outstanding clarity, and explanation of concepts demonstrated in the information presented; approaches the weekly discussion with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. The posting directly addresses key issues, questions, or problems related to the topic of discussion. The posting applies course concepts with examples learned from the material provided during the weekly reading or other relevant examples from the clinical practice; the student is showing applied knowledge and understanding of the topic. Also,
the posting offers original and thoughtful insight, synthesis, or observation that demonstrates a strong understanding of the concepts and ideas pertaining to the discussion topic (use of examples). The student’s initial thread response is rich in critical thinking and full of thought, insight, and analysis; the argument is clear and concise.
The student uses a style and voice that are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but that also shows originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures are used. The student is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
The student provides robust support from credible, current (less than five years old), and relevant scholarly references (at least two). The supporting evidence meets or exceeds the minimum number of required scholarly references