After viewing this 43-minute video, Using Prisoners as Research Subjects, please

After viewing this 43-minute video, Using Prisoners as Research Subjects, please respond to all of the following questions in this Discussion Board:
1. Dr. Kligman conducted experiments on humans who were in prison. Discuss in detail one of the ethical principles from the textbook relevant to this situation.
2. This is a one-sided, biased story of abuse, moral indifference and greed. There is always the other side. As a nurse who understands the parts of a research study and the related research ethics, what further information would you like to know to make an impartial and fair-minded decision about this ethical situation?
3. When conducting research on human subjects, there are always risks and benefits. Can you imagine a time in which yourself or a family member might choose to take part in an experimental treatment for which the risks/benefits are not known? Put yourself into that person’s shoes and describe your feelings in one paragraph. 4. In your opinion, should prisoners now be allowed to become research subjects while in prison? A) Why, and B) why not? (Be sure to fully discuss both aspects.)
One (1) primary response and at least two (2) secondary responses are expected from each student for this individual assignment. Responses are defined as scholarly writing in response to the posted prompt on the Discussion Board. Since this is a research course, students should support opinions and original thought with evidence from contemporary literature, including nursing literature, not just references from the textbook and the film. Students will synthesize information related to course readings and research, present their ideas, and continue the discussion with thoughtful new contributions. Netiquette is observed. Each student will post the primary response to the Discussion Board by Wednesday at 11:59 pm of Week 4. During the week, each student will post two (2) secondary responses to other students’ postings to the Discussion Board by Sunday at 11:59 pm of Week 4. These secondary responses may include answers to questions posted by other students, respectful comments to other postings, or information related to these ethical issues. Student’s postings will be graded as described in Discussion Board participation in the syllabus and rubric, which includes correct grammar and references to course readings, APA citation of additional current scholarly nursing journals referred to in the post, and/or external scholarly links. Include three (3) references for the initial Discussion Board post (you may reference this film, but this does not count toward your 3 references), and at least one (1) reference in your secondary responses.
Late initial postings will have a 5-point deduction per day. If not submitted by the due date, the assignment will be graded with a zero. Discussion Board assignments cannot be made up after the due date. Writing style, formatting, and proper grammar are important.
Discussion Board #2: Ethical Dilemmas in Research Discussion Board Rubric
Points
Characterization of Response
Primary Response:
60 points
(4 questions: 15 points each)
Primary response is a clear discussion addressing all of the questions and points posted on the Discussion Board. The student will integrate course readings, personal opinion, original thoughts, questions, and new ideas related to the topic. The student will also include an understanding of the relationships of these ethical issues to nursing.
Student presents a logical argument that is organized for easy understanding. Post meets 250-word minimum. Material is synthesized and referenced properly according to APA format. Student uses a minimum of 3 references (you may reference this film, but this does not count toward your 3 references).
Students will post their initial response to the Discussion Board by Wednesday of the Discussion Board week so that others may respond to their discussion. Student must post a primary response before being able to view other posts. Five (5) points will be deducted per day for all late initial postings after Wednesday up to the Discussion Board’s final deadline. Posts not submitted by the deadline will be given a zero (0) for this section. Initial post incorporates answers to the posed questions surrounding the ethical principles.
Secondary Responses:
30 points
(2 responses: 15 points each)
Secondary responses are a minimum of two (2) required, at least 150 words each, and must be on different threads. Responses may address opposing views or agreement with posted ideas. These responses should be backed up with details and evidence to support the response, meaning citations and references are required. Students are encouraged to extend the topic to a deeper level with the use of personal experience, new questions, and additional external information linked or attached that adds depth to the discussion. Failure to post responses within the stated time frame given will result in a grade of zero (0) for this section of the Discussion Board. 10 points
Writing demonstrates clear sentence structure and grammatically correct sentences. Paragraphs are well developed. Writing shows smooth transitions between ideas creating a nice flow for the reader to follow. Post is written in 3rd person and uses proper citations. Attention is paid to correct spelling and grammar. Proper use of APA formatting is noted with citations and references. ALL references must be in full APA format, not just URL’s.
100 points
Total for this Discussion Board entry
Important Note: Since this is a nursing research course, students are expected to log on to the Drexel Library online site for research relevant to the assignment, synthesize the material, and cite the references according to correct APA format.