Assignment: Developing a Small Nursing Informatics Project for Your Organization

Assignment: Developing a Small Nursing Informatics Project for Your Organization, Part 2: Implementation-
Uncontrolled HTN Project Initiation – Using the Self-Monitored BP Device (Continued)
The final summary will include the complete evaluation of the full project and lessons learned—what went well and what needs update and revisions.
This will be a professional scholarly paper using APA 7. Be sure to include a one-half to one-page executive summary.
Evaluate how well your small nursing informatics project was designed, planned, and
implemented. (The nursing Informatics Project Initiation of part 1 is: Uncontrolled HTN Project Initiation-Using the self- Monitored BP device)
Continue to implement your small nursing informatics project, or propose how you might implement your project, applying the 10 tracking documents developed in Part 1. Now track your project to make sure the implementation is going as planned. Remember, the goal of this project is to demonstrate, through a small nursing informatics project, your understanding of nursing informatics.
FYI: Please note Part I assignment will be uploaded for your review in order to answer/complete this present assignment part 2)
Please address each of the bulleted subtopics below; all references must have in-text citation on each paragraph. References must be within 5yrs.
The Introduction and purpose of this paper should be clear, precise, and well-elaborated addressing all the main points of this paper.
• This paper is identifying Uncontrolled HTN Project Initiation-Using the self- Monitored BP device which is currently undergoing the initiation stage in our community clinic.
Activities to track with application of tools:
• Is the project staying within scope? (Scope)
• Were all of the gaps identified? (Gap Analysis)
• Is the project following the timeline? (Project timeline)
• If you had a budget, is it on track? (Yes budget is on track, because it is government – The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) release fund for hypertension control)
• Were all of the work activities correctly assigned? (WBS)
• Are team members responsible? (RACI)
• Did the project start on time, inline to meet due date? (Gantt)
• Are you holding weekly status meetings and documented all activities? Are all team members in attendance and communicated with? (Communication Plan)
• Are all changes approved and documented? (Change Management Plan)
• Are all risks identified, prioritized, assigned an owner and mitigation plan developed? (Risk Management Plan)
• Conclusion: The final summary will include the complete evaluation of the full project and lessons learned: what went well and what needs updated and revised
The 10 documents from Part 1 will be added to the final paper as appendices
References
The scholarly paper will include a minimum of 10 current citations from peer-reviewed journals. Every statement made in a scholarly report must be supported by a reference. Please note that only primary sources are to be used. Peer-reviewed journal articles should make up the bulk of your references specific page numbers when necessary. Note that an article referred in a book is a secondary source.