CITE THE LAB AND TEXTBOOK AT THE END OF RELFECTION(BOTH ATTACHED BELOW), NO ADDI

CITE THE LAB AND TEXTBOOK AT THE END OF RELFECTION(BOTH ATTACHED BELOW), NO ADDITIONAL SOURCES REQUIRED.
(Reflection Papers Instructions and Grading Rubric
Instructions:
During week 8 and week 16 you will submit a Reflection Paper. For each paper you will select a podcast episode to listen to from The Happiness Lab with Dr. Laurie Santos found at this website: https://www.happinesslab.fm/ (Links to an external site.)
Along with an APA formatted title page and references page, your paper should also contain the following sections:
Introduction: Introduce your paper topic stating the season, and episode including the title of the podcast that you listened to, and briefly explain why you chose this podcast (4-6 sentence paragraph).
Summarize and Synthesize: For This Reflection Paper 2, you will relate 4-6 concepts/theories/topics from chapters 7-12(TEXTBOOK ATTCHED). In your paper, please italicize the specific concepts/theories/topics that you relate from the text (2 full pages).
IMPORTANT NOTE: I will be looking for evidence of critical thought and depth of processing as you relate key points to specific points in the text. For example: “The author described how the participants seemed to gravitate back to their original level of happiness. This relates to the idea of happiness set point.” [this example does not explain the idea of happiness set point as described by the text, so this example is insufficient]. Here is an example of acceptable synthesis: “In the study described in the podcast, the researcher split the participants into two groups. In the first group, all the participants had experienced a traumatic event and the second group had not experienced any traumatic events. In both groups, the researcher assessed the participants’ levels of happiness and both groups seemed to score similarly in happiness levels after 6 months. The results of the study relate to the happiness set point theory described by Compton and Hoffman (2020) which explains that genetically, humans are predisposed to have an average level of happiness after temporary highs and lows. This means that even after experiencing extremes in emotions, perhaps triggered by trauma, humans’ happiness levels tend to level out.” [Notice the difference between a surface explanation (in the first example) and one that demonstrates critical thinking and a detailed explanation (in the second example).] Also notice that no direct quotes are used to carry the main points. Please avoid using direct quotes. Rather, use your own words to demonstrate your clear understanding of the major points and conclusions.
Application: Apply what you learned from this episode into your life personally or to life in general. Explain how you can or cannot use this information in your life moving forward (1-2 full pages).
ANOTHER IMPORTANT NOTE: Please use boldface for each section header (Introduction, Summarize and Synthesize, Application). Follow the formatted example Download formatted exampleprovided.
Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content:
60%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Below Expectations
Not Present
Content
24-30 pts.
All components as described in the assignment have been clearly and thoroughly addressed. Introduction contains all required elements. Summary and Synthesis section provides a detailed summary of the major points of the podcast and relates those to 4-6 concepts/theories from the text. The application section provides a thoughtful application of the concepts from the podcast to real life in appropriate detail. Assertions are relevant and properly supported by evidence (explanation/examples) and proper citation. Quality of writing indicates excellent comprehension regarding the topic. The application of ideas is accurate and prudent. The paper meets the page length requirements.
17-23 pts.
All components as described in the assignment have been addressed. Each section is included but one or more sections could be enhanced with additional evidence of critical thought and/or detail. Assertions are generally relevant and mostly supported by evidence. Quality of writing indicates satisfactory comprehension regarding the topic. Application of ideas is satisfactory but leaves room for improvement. The paper meets the page length requirements or comes very close.
10-16 pts.
Most components as described in the assignment have been addressed, or all components are present but need improvement. Some assertions are relevant and may or may not be supported by evidence. Quality of writing indicates minimal comprehension regarding the topic; application of ideas is somewhat vague. The paper does not meet the page length requirements.
1-9 pts.
Few components as described in the assignment have been addressed, or many components are missing. Quality of writing leave much room for improvement and could better demonstrate comprehension regarding the topic; application of ideas may be inaccurate. The paper does not meet the page length requirements.
0 points
Does not meet expectations
Structure
30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Below Expectations
Not Present
Organization
10pts.
Title page present and accurate. APA headings as provided in the example are used to organize the paper. All required elements are included and presented (see example provided). The major points/topic is presented clearly and logically.
8-9 pts.
Title page is present but may have errors. Headings are present but may not be consistent or accurately formatted.
All required elements are included.
The topic is addressed with reasonable logic. 4-7 pts.
Title page is present, but format may be incorrect. Headings are not present or inconsistent. Most required elements are included and are mostly organized. The topic is addressed but difficult to follow logically. 1-3 pts.
Title page is present with errors or missing. Headings are not used. Few or no required formatting elements are included. It is difficult to find logical reasoning in the paper.
0 points
Does not meet expectations
Style
10 pts.
The paper properly uses current APA style (following the provided example). The paper reflects a college/professional-level voice and vocabulary. Textbook terms are italicized. Writing mechanics, spelling and grammar are (or mostly) error-free.
8-9 pts.
The paper consistently uses current APA style with few or no exceptions. The paper reflects a college/professional-level voice and vocabulary. Textbook terms are italicized. There are very few spelling and grammar errors.
4-7 pts.
The paper inconsistently uses APA style. The paper does not consistently reflect a college/professional-level voice and vocabulary. Textbook terms are not italicized. There are spelling and grammar errors.
1-3 pts.
The paper erroneously uses or does not use APA style. The paper does not reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. Textbook terms are not italicized. Errors in writing mechanics/spelling/ grammar errors distract.
0 points
Does not meet expectations
Total