Do NOT provide an in depth coverage or report of the case itself but rather anal

Do NOT provide an in depth
coverage or report of the case itself but rather analyze it
the findings, the implications. The ‘bigger picture’ – don’t
focus on the person but rather the issue at hand.
I. Policy Background: Identify the public health problem and be sure to be specific
about the problem’s scope and magnitude. Use quantitative data and sources to support
(statistics and etc would be useful). Be sure to identify who is affected, nature of the
problem, key factors, and factors associated with the problem. Define the characteristics
(frequency, severity, scope, economic, and budgetary impacts) of the problem or issue. your assignment should
NOT be in question and answer format. It should be presented in paragraph format. What is the problem to be addressed? State the
problem meaningfully.
· What was the event or series of event that was a
catalyst for the case? Is it a problem or crisis that demands immediate
attention? What interests are at stake for the actor (ie
state or federal government) overall. Use data to support, Focus on the central, critical factors, Identify who is concerned and why? II. Facts of the Case: Include a summary of the pertinent facts and legal points
raised in the case. It will show the nature of the litigation, based on what
occurrences, and what happened in the lower court(s). Keys: make sure you describe the nature of the case, a
statement of the relevant law, a short summary of the case. Explain who did what to whom and why
the case is being presented. III. Reasoning and opinions: Identify the actions taken by the lower courts (if this case
is being heard in the supreme court).If it was heard in the Supreme Court, identify how
each justice voted. What was the decision? Was a policy created? A law upheld? IV. Analysis: Evaluate the significance of the case, its relationship to
other cases, its place in history,
and what it shows about the Court, the impact it has on
government, society, and public health implications. Go into depth here. This section
important- this is where the depth of the paper is. How does the case influence public health? Have any unintended consequences
been identified. Case is below: https://www.justice.gov/opa/page/file/1159196/download
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/new-jersey-doctor-pleads-guilty-13-million-conspiracy-defraud-medicare-telemedicine-orders
https://www.app.com/story/news/local/courts/2019/09/13/toms-river-doctor-admits-part-13-m-scheme-rip-off-medicare-taxpayers/2312005001/
https://www.app.com/story/money/business/consumer/press-on-your-side/2019/04/01/nj-woman-sent-back-brace-she-didnt-need-medicare-taxes-paid/3128794002/
https://www.app.com/story/money/business/consumer/press-on-your-side/2019/04/05/medical-brace-firm-we-dont-send-them-people-who-dont-want-them/3369616002/