Individual Student Profile & Analysis Complete your Module 1 Assignment by the e

Individual Student Profile & Analysis
Complete your Module 1 Assignment by the end of Week 1.
The purpose of this Individual Student Profile Analysis assignment is to develop your Individual Student Profile as you begin to develop and expand your skills as a reflective practitioner. This Analysis assignment includes a paper with two parts: (1) The interplay Between Theory and Practice and (2) The Individual Student Profile professional goals.
In preparation for completing a final paper, complete these steps:
Step 1. Access and Review
Individual Student Profile Personal goals: This Individual Student Profile contains your philosophy of learning and professional goals statements (3-5), which will state your intent as a graduate professional. For each goal statement, you will describe how the goal translates into actions you intend to use in your professional setting.
Step 2. Access and Review
Begin by accessing and reviewing the Reflective Thinking video and information available at this link:
https://ace.instructure.com/courses/860602/pages/21st-century-toolbox-skills?module_item_id=17672989
Step 3. Consider and Reflect
To set the stage for this assignment, consider and reflect on the following scenario:
Evan is working at the hospital and is now attending American College of Education (ACE) to earn his Master of Science degree in Nursing. Evan recognizes that both the ACE and the hospital mission and vision act as frameworks to guide professional nursing practice and care delivery. Evan decides he wants to learn more about the relationship among nursing theories, theories from other disciplines, mission, and vision and their impact on professional practice and patient-centered care.
Step 4. Select
Select one nursing theory and a theory from a related discipline to describe how these serve as frameworks for reflecting on professional goals and making decisions related to patient-centered care
Step 5. Reflect
Reflect upon the relationship of leadership, decision making, and accountability to your professional role. Applying concepts from the Reflective Thinking video and information, create a Statement of Goals to guide your professional practice integrating the use of theory, leadership, and professional accountability.
Step 6. Develop 3-5 Professional Goals
Step 7. Structure
Structure the 2- to 3-page (excluding the title and references pages) paper using this outline:
Title Page
Introduction
Body of the Paper
Conclusion
References page
Writing Reminders
The Analysis assignment will be graded using the assignments rubric on quality and depth of information provided, clarity of writing, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. Writing should demonstrate original thought without an over-reliance on the works of others.
Create your paper using Microsoft Word. The document is saved as MS Word ending in “.docx”
APA format is required. Level 1 headers should identify the required components of the assignment. All information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited and listed in the references using APA format.
Please read the Assignment Guidelines (Links to an external site.) before you begin working.
Rubric
Bachelor’s Assignment Rubric v.3
Bachelor’s Assignment Rubric v.3
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates a Conceptual Understanding
20 to >16.9 pts
Mastery
A. Clearly addressed all elements of the assignment. B. Demonstrated real-world application.
16.9 to >13.9 pts
Marginal
A. Addressed most of the elements of the assignment. B. Demonstrated marginal real-world application.
13.9 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
A. Somewhat addressed the elements of the assignment. B. Demonstrated little to no real-world application.
0 pts
No submission
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Issues/Problems
30 to >25.4 pts
Mastery
A. Clearly addressed the issue/problem. B. Exhibited scholarly analysis. C. Established a solid connection to theory and/or research. D. Demonstrated critical thinking surrounding the issue/problem with depth and breadth. E. Formulated deep conclusion and/or implications.
25.4 to >20.9 pts
Marginal
A. Addressed most of the issue/problem. B. Somewhat exhibited scholarly analysis. C. Established some connection to theory and/or research. D. Demonstrated a superficial understanding of the issue/problem. E. Formulated surface level conclusion and/or implications.
20.9 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
A. Many issues/problems not addressed. B. Exhibited little to no scholarly analysis. C. Established little to no connection to theory and/or research. D. Demonstrated limited evidence of understanding the problem/issue. E. Formulated limited evidence of conclusion and/or implications.
0 pts
No submission
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Evidence
30 to >25.4 pts
Mastery
A. Displayed a variety of scholarly references as evidence. B. Demonstrated use of scholarly literature and research beyond sources provided in the course.
25.4 to >20.9 pts
Marginal
A. Displayed a marginal use of references. B. Demonstrated a marginal use of literature and research provided in the course.
20.9 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
A. Displayed little to no use of references. B. Demonstrated little to no use of literature and research provided in the course.
0 pts
No submission
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing
10 to >8.4 pts
Mastery
A. Exceeded or met formal writing standards. B. Demonstrated correct grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling.
8.4 to >6.9 pts
Marginal
A. Marginally met a basic level of formal writing standards. B. Demonstrated inconsistent use of grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling.
6.9 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
A. Demonstrated limited basic formal writing skills. B. Demonstrated difficulty with grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling.
0 pts
No submission
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
10 to >7.9 pts
Mastery
A. Demonstrated near-perfect APA formatting.
7.9 to >5.9 pts
Marginal
A. Demonstrated marginally correct APA formatting.
5.9 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
A. Demonstrated limited correct APA formatting.
0 pts
No submission
10 pts
Total Points: 100