Research Topic: How does cyberbullying cause child/adolescence suicide? Locate

Research Topic: How does cyberbullying cause child/adolescence suicide?
Locate
10 journal
articles that have specific relevance to your topic. These articles must be from
peer-reviewed publications. You may
not use magazines, webpages, blogs, Psychology Today, Wikipedia, newspaper
articles, or any other source that is not a peer-reviewed, journal
article. You should focus on how
both your topic and your variables have been addressed in
the literature.
Give
the reference for the article using APA format.
Here
is the general format for referencing a journal article:
Format: Author, A. A. (Year). Title of article. Title
of Periodical, volume number(issue number, only if each issue
begins at page 1), pages
Sample:
Negriff, S.. (2019). Depressive symptoms predict
characteristics of online social networks. Journal
of Adolescent Health, 65(1), 101-106.
Write
the annotation (summary) of the article
Your
annotation should follow the main parts of a research article – introduction,
method, results, and discussion.
You
MUST include all of the following in your annotation:
a.
Introduction: Write one
or two sentences that address the research topic/purpose of the paper and
any specific hypotheses that are being tested.
b.
Method: Write one
or two sentences that state how many participants, any important
characteristics of the participants, and what materials/procedures were used.
c.
Results: Write one
to three sentences that present results for the research question/hypothesis
presented in “i” above. In other words,
the introduction presented one or more questions, now you give the answers to
the questions.
d.
Discussion: Write one
or two sentences that present the implications and importance of the
results.
Please
note that you may not use the abstract or any part thereof as your
annotation (summary). Anyone who
includes all or part of an abstract in their annotated bibliography will
receive zero points for the assignment and possibly a failing grade in the
class.
Sample annotations
Below is some
guidance on what your annotated bibliography should look like.
Annotation #1
Garst,
J., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1997). Advertising’s effects on men’s gender role
attitudes. Sex Roles, 36(9-10),
551-572.
The authors in this article examine whether media
images of men influence the gender role attitudes that men express soon after
being exposed to the images. The study examined males between the ages of 17
and 46. The men observed male models in magazine ads that portrayed
traditionally masculine vs. androgynous images, and men of different ages. The
results suggest that men’s gender role attitudes can be influence by the images
of men they regularly see in the mass media. The authors conclude that,
nontraditional men’s gender role attitudes may be unstable and susceptible to
momentary influences.
Annotation #2
Waite, L. J.,
Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and the
erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. American
Sociological Review, 51(4), 541-554.
The authors use data from the National Longitudinal
Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily
living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations,
moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their
hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in
studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying
increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about
families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams shows no significant gender
differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living.
Annotation #3
Voeltz, L.M. (1980). Children’s attitudes toward handicapped peers. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84(5), 455-464.
As services for severely handicapped children become increasingly available within neighborhood public schools, children’s attitudes toward handicapped peers in integrated settings warrant attention. Factor analysis of attitude survey responses of 2,392 children revealed four factors underlying attitudes toward handicapped peers: social-contact willingness, deviance consequation, and two actual contact dimensions. Upper elementary-age children, girls, and children in schools with most contact with severely handicapped peers expressed the most accepting attitudes. Results of this study suggest the modifiability of children’s attitudes and the need to develop interventions to facilitate social acceptance of individual differences in integrated school settings.