The purpose of this paper is to appraise the qualitative research form, dependab

The purpose of this paper is to appraise the qualitative research form, dependability, data collection/analysis, discussion/conclusions, and overall merit of a qualitative research article.
Using the same qualitative study you chose for the M3 Qualitative Critique Part 1 and the M7 Qualitative Critique Part 2, critique the research form:
Do the authors identify the form of qualitative research used (e.g., grounded theory, phenomenology, ethnography)?
Evaluate whether the form of research chosen is appropriate for the topic and research question(s).
If the form of qualitative research is not identified, discuss how this affects study quality.
Then, examine the dependability:
Appraise the clarity and appropriateness of the research processes.
Were strategies such as peer review or external audit used to increase dependability of results?
How detailed is the description of data collection processes?
Assess the data collection and analysis:
Describe the specific type of data collection methods used (e.g., interviews, focus groups, observations).
Appraise the strengths and limitations of the data collection methods.
To what extent do the authors use quotes to reflect participant voice and to support their findings?
Analyze the discussion and conclusions:
Discuss the main findings of the study. What is the practical or clinical significance of the findings?
Does the discussion section align appropriately with the study results?
Do the authors effectively situate results within past literature and acknowledge pertinent study limitations?
In the discussion and/or conclusions, do the authors over-reach beyond the study findings?
Finally, considering your critiques of all sections of this study (including the previous M3 and M7 papers), analyze the overall merit of the study.
This paper should be 5-6 pages and follow current APA guidelines. You must use APA heading levels to organize the paper and identify the main aspects of your critique. Support your analysis with 5 sources in addition to the article being critiqued.