The topic: Why covid-19 vaccine is improtant? 1) Decrease morbidity 2) Increase

The topic: Why covid-19 vaccine is improtant?
1) Decrease morbidity
2) Increase immunity
I would like you to put as much details as possible. No plagiarism
The articles have to be less than 10 years.
COMPETENCIES
1009.1.3 : Presentation Strategies
The graduate utilizes appropriate presentational communication strategies in personal and professional settings.
INTRODUCTION
An effective presentation requires careful preparation. In this task, you will create a plan for an informative or persuasive presentation that addresses a research-based, academic topic. Your preparation will include researching your chosen topic, planning for your intended audience, and creating an outline or other plan for your presentation.
REQUIREMENTS
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
A. Describe your intended audience and why the topic is important to this audience (suggested length of 2–5 sentences).
B. Create a presentation plan (e.g., outline) for a five- to seven-minute presentation on your chosen topic by including the following parts:
1. An effective introduction that includes the following aspects:
• an attention-getting opening
• a thesis statement
• a preview of the main points of the presentation
Note: For a five- to seven-minute speech, two to three main points are recommended.
2. Supporting evidence (e.g., statistics, published research) for the main points
Note: Avoid using personal opinion, personal research, or personal experience as your supporting evidence.
3. an effective conclusion that includes a summary of the main points and closing comments.
4. a minimum of three credible sources
a. Acknowledge sources within the text for all content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized, and provide a reference list that includes the author, date of publication, title, and location of information (e.g., publisher, journal, website URL) for each source. APA citation style is strongly encouraged.
Note: Refer to the attached APA Guide for Communication Performance Tasks if needed.
C. Attach one visual element (e.g., chart, graph, picture, model) that supports one of the main points with acknowledgement of any source information used.
Review this chart to determine if your source is credible.
Credible
Non-Credible
Journals by authors respected and well known in their specific fields
Websites from credible institutions like Mayo Clinic, Department of Justice, and University-affiliated institutions
Multimedia source: Ted-Talks
Materials published in the last ten years (when more recent information is available)
Websites: The more information available, the more credible the website. There is a specific author, the audience is clear, the purpose is informative not biased, and the information is regularly updated. Also look for websites ending in .edu and .gov.
Blogs, social media posts, or other self-authored sites
Research articles without citations
Websites with information not from an author or governmental department
Materials published over 15 years ago or have theories that are clearly out-of date
Websites: There is not much information available. If the purpose is not informative but may have other motives, like to persuade, the site may not be credible. The website is not regularly updated or the author is unreliable such as Wikipedia.